$39 million to tear down and replace a "housing project" concentration camp in Nashville. 498 "units". That's $78,000 per "unit". As usual, far more than it would cost to buy a modest house for each family. Definitely more than it would cost to build 498 modest houses commercially. Can't do that, though. Then they might get off the plantation, lots of house owners vote... Republican.
We are a sad joke..
Tuesday, May 23, 2006
Saturday, May 20, 2006
A cry of the heart in the form of buggery...
First, read this silliness...
"Shortbus," an explicit, largely improvised arthouse flick that includes a rendition of the American national anthem during a gay sex scene, is a direct provocation, director John Cameron Mitchell admitted.
"It's a little bit of a cri de coeur to us, a little bit of a call to arms" against the prevailing conservatism, he told a media conference, adding that his country was living in "the era of Bush, which is about clamping down, being scared."
The 43-year-old, whose previous work was "Hedwig and the Angry Inch," about a transsexual rock singer, said the film was his own small act of defiance against Bush.
"If you can't do elections you might as well do erections," he said.
Although the first half of the film is filled with sex, including orgies and masturbation, the act itself is not meant to be erotic but rather to challenge the audience and make it confront issues such as loneliness, the illusion of self-sufficiency and other seemingly unrelated problems, Mitchell said.
One scene likely to create controversy in the United States and some other countries shows a gay threesome in which one participant joyfully bellows "The Star Spangled Banner."
I'm sorry, but, WHAT? How twisted up a mind does one have to have to think that a picture of catamites doing what they do while singing the national anthem means anything at all? If this is the cry of your heart, you are profoundly poor of spirit.
"Hmm, here I have a couple of million euros. What movie can I make that will be meaningful, that will advance the human condition, that will show my heart?
I KNOW!!!"
Every decent homosexual I've ever known just wanted his or her sexuality to be irrelevant, as it should usually be. Why do some people think that I, and straight people generally, give a rat's scabby ass about some stranger's sexual tastes? Here's a clue- WE DON"T. Unless I am or might become involved, I would rather that EVERYONE'S sexual tastes and activities remain private. It's NOT MY BUSINESS. Just as mine is not theirs.
But that's not enough for this character. He has to put it in the spotlight, "Look at me!"
Don't even get me started with making homosexuals a legally protected class. If we're going to start protecting people based on whom they like to fuck, sign me up for some affirmative action because I like women to wear heels and stockings. That's a sexual taste, just like Mr. Mitchell's is.
And if it's exterme sexual tastes only, then we should start out protecting furries.
News flash, artboy- you can't "defy" someone who is not trying to assert control over you. And where is this "clamping down"?
I'll tell you where it is. It's in the places where they HANG sodomites. Why don't you try to "directly provoke" the people who would legally and proudly KILL YOU? Sing the IRANIAN anthem, or the SAUDI.
Then you WOULD be standing up for homosexuals who ARE persecuted.
Lightweight.
"It's a little bit of a cri de coeur to us, a little bit of a call to arms" against the prevailing conservatism, he told a media conference, adding that his country was living in "the era of Bush, which is about clamping down, being scared."
The 43-year-old, whose previous work was "Hedwig and the Angry Inch," about a transsexual rock singer, said the film was his own small act of defiance against Bush.
"If you can't do elections you might as well do erections," he said.
Although the first half of the film is filled with sex, including orgies and masturbation, the act itself is not meant to be erotic but rather to challenge the audience and make it confront issues such as loneliness, the illusion of self-sufficiency and other seemingly unrelated problems, Mitchell said.
One scene likely to create controversy in the United States and some other countries shows a gay threesome in which one participant joyfully bellows "The Star Spangled Banner."
I'm sorry, but, WHAT? How twisted up a mind does one have to have to think that a picture of catamites doing what they do while singing the national anthem means anything at all? If this is the cry of your heart, you are profoundly poor of spirit.
"Hmm, here I have a couple of million euros. What movie can I make that will be meaningful, that will advance the human condition, that will show my heart?
I KNOW!!!"
Every decent homosexual I've ever known just wanted his or her sexuality to be irrelevant, as it should usually be. Why do some people think that I, and straight people generally, give a rat's scabby ass about some stranger's sexual tastes? Here's a clue- WE DON"T. Unless I am or might become involved, I would rather that EVERYONE'S sexual tastes and activities remain private. It's NOT MY BUSINESS. Just as mine is not theirs.
But that's not enough for this character. He has to put it in the spotlight, "Look at me!"
Don't even get me started with making homosexuals a legally protected class. If we're going to start protecting people based on whom they like to fuck, sign me up for some affirmative action because I like women to wear heels and stockings. That's a sexual taste, just like Mr. Mitchell's is.
And if it's exterme sexual tastes only, then we should start out protecting furries.
News flash, artboy- you can't "defy" someone who is not trying to assert control over you. And where is this "clamping down"?
I'll tell you where it is. It's in the places where they HANG sodomites. Why don't you try to "directly provoke" the people who would legally and proudly KILL YOU? Sing the IRANIAN anthem, or the SAUDI.
Then you WOULD be standing up for homosexuals who ARE persecuted.
Lightweight.
Friday, May 19, 2006
Official English language law...
that actually does something. Here's a draft for Congress:
“English is the official language of the United States.
Not withstanding any other provision of law, all documents, regulations, statutes, reports, and records of the United States shall be created, made, and printed in English only. Not withstanding any other provision of law, no document, regulation, statute, report, or record of the United States shall be translated into, distributed, or printed in any foreign language at public expense.
The only exceptions to this section are:
(a) The translation or transcription of evidence and proceedings in which a party or witness is unable to understand or communicate in English, to the extent necessary to make the proceedings or testimony comprehensible to the party or witness. In all such proceedings, the English version of the record shall be the official record.
(b) Communications on behalf of the United States which are prepared for transmission, or actually transmitted, solely to foreign countries.
(c) Reports or transcripts of communications originally generated in a language other than English, when such reports or transcripts are made to an officer or employee of the United States in the course and scope of his duties.
Inability of any person under the jurisdiction of the United States to understand or communicate in English will not impair any right due such person under the laws of the United States.
Inability of any person to understand or communicate in English sufficiently to perform his duties shall disqualify all such persons from holding office or employment of the United States.
No form or application procedure for any benefit requested from the United States under any educational, welfare, grant, or other such program will be prepared, conducted,or accepted for review in any language other than English.
Inability to understand a proceeding conducted in English shall disqualify any person from acting as a trier of fact or law in that proceeding.
Inability of any person under the jurisdiction of the United States to understand or communicate in English will not relieve such person of any duty imposed by the laws of the United States.
Inability of any person under the jurisdiction of the United States to understand or communicate in English may not be considered in any way as a defense, or as a mitigating factor, in any proceeding where such a person is accused of a crime or otherwise a party in any action before any adjudicatory proceeding of the United States. Evidence of such inability shall not be admitted in any proceeding for such purpose.”
How’s that?
“English is the official language of the United States.
Not withstanding any other provision of law, all documents, regulations, statutes, reports, and records of the United States shall be created, made, and printed in English only. Not withstanding any other provision of law, no document, regulation, statute, report, or record of the United States shall be translated into, distributed, or printed in any foreign language at public expense.
The only exceptions to this section are:
(a) The translation or transcription of evidence and proceedings in which a party or witness is unable to understand or communicate in English, to the extent necessary to make the proceedings or testimony comprehensible to the party or witness. In all such proceedings, the English version of the record shall be the official record.
(b) Communications on behalf of the United States which are prepared for transmission, or actually transmitted, solely to foreign countries.
(c) Reports or transcripts of communications originally generated in a language other than English, when such reports or transcripts are made to an officer or employee of the United States in the course and scope of his duties.
Inability of any person under the jurisdiction of the United States to understand or communicate in English will not impair any right due such person under the laws of the United States.
Inability of any person to understand or communicate in English sufficiently to perform his duties shall disqualify all such persons from holding office or employment of the United States.
No form or application procedure for any benefit requested from the United States under any educational, welfare, grant, or other such program will be prepared, conducted,or accepted for review in any language other than English.
Inability to understand a proceeding conducted in English shall disqualify any person from acting as a trier of fact or law in that proceeding.
Inability of any person under the jurisdiction of the United States to understand or communicate in English will not relieve such person of any duty imposed by the laws of the United States.
Inability of any person under the jurisdiction of the United States to understand or communicate in English may not be considered in any way as a defense, or as a mitigating factor, in any proceeding where such a person is accused of a crime or otherwise a party in any action before any adjudicatory proceeding of the United States. Evidence of such inability shall not be admitted in any proceeding for such purpose.”
How’s that?
Tuesday, May 16, 2006
A reaction to my Hirsi welcome!
The author of
www.militantislammonitor.org , a quite useful news collector whom I'll blogroll, tells me
"The US deserves Magan/Ali whatever her name is", and cites us to an article which rightly reminds us that Theo Van Gogh was slaughtered and should be remembered for his work and death. He's right about that and I agree. The article goes on to review Ms. Hirsi's financial success from self promotion, and I suppose that's true enough, Jane Ordinary Somali wouldn't be on a lecture tour but J. O. S. didn't write "Submission" either. The article continues,
" Her deragatory remarks about Islam and Muslims, as a member of parliament have rendered her ineffectual when it comes to having an influence on Muslims,and carrying out her stated mission to liberate Muslim women. As a result she made her name 'preaching to the converted',and has announced that she is working on a book with the preticious title "The Path to Enlightenment".Besides the fact that Ali is no theologian, it is obvious that no Muslim would care to be enlightened by someone who has publicly renounced their religion and is considerd an apostate."
EXACTLY. We are not trying to "enlighten" Moslems within their religion. Our liberties are inconsistent with Moslem theology. Sharia is inconsistent with the U. S. Constitution. A "true believing Moslem" can't live his faith, as currently defined by our enemies, in our world. Not any more than he could dine atWaycrazy's , or permit his daughter to dance in the ballet.
If you are a Moslem, and you believe that your society should have civil religious liberty, you ARE an apostate.
If you are a Moslem and believe that women who want to should be free to show their hair or vote, you ARE an apostate.
If you are a Moslem, and believe that your society should contain stores where bacon or Bibles are freely sold, you ARE an apostate. Our enemies are as pure as Loyola- there are only believers and the damned.
And an essential, organic part of their belief is that there should be NO SUCH THING AS CIVIL SOCIETY. They believe that all life should be guided by Allah's will, and that will includes no freedom for non believers. Dhimmi or dead.
And we can fight them by example or choose to continue not to.
No, she's not perfect. But I believe her message is better than the one from the Taliban's press secretary. And her message- that Islam, as believed, preached, and practiced by our enemies- is slavery and violence for women- should be shouted loudly and regularly. Our red "feminists" are M.I.A. about it, their eyes closed by tears of the white man.
Anything that helps draw the lines more clearly is a good thing. If our enemies hate her, if they see her as their enemy, then she belongs here. Her presence is a giant signal "WE ARE YOUR ENEMY. WE SHELTER AND PRAISE THE APOSTATE. WE ARE PROUD TO HAVE HER HERE. LOOK, HERE SHE CAN SAY WHAT SHE WANTS. ". Face it- Europe won't, can't resist effectively. We, the U. S., are the real foe of slavery, the place they can't leave alone. Our culture is killing theirs.
So again, welcome.
"The US deserves Magan/Ali whatever her name is", and cites us to an article which rightly reminds us that Theo Van Gogh was slaughtered and should be remembered for his work and death. He's right about that and I agree. The article goes on to review Ms. Hirsi's financial success from self promotion, and I suppose that's true enough, Jane Ordinary Somali wouldn't be on a lecture tour but J. O. S. didn't write "Submission" either. The article continues,
EXACTLY. We are not trying to "enlighten" Moslems within their religion. Our liberties are inconsistent with Moslem theology. Sharia is inconsistent with the U. S. Constitution. A "true believing Moslem" can't live his faith, as currently defined by our enemies, in our world. Not any more than he could dine at
If you are a Moslem, and you believe that your society should have civil religious liberty, you ARE an apostate.
If you are a Moslem and believe that women who want to should be free to show their hair or vote, you ARE an apostate.
If you are a Moslem, and believe that your society should contain stores where bacon or Bibles are freely sold, you ARE an apostate. Our enemies are as pure as Loyola- there are only believers and the damned.
And an essential, organic part of their belief is that there should be NO SUCH THING AS CIVIL SOCIETY. They believe that all life should be guided by Allah's will, and that will includes no freedom for non believers. Dhimmi or dead.
And we can fight them by example or choose to continue not to.
No, she's not perfect. But I believe her message is better than the one from the Taliban's press secretary. And her message- that Islam, as believed, preached, and practiced by our enemies- is slavery and violence for women- should be shouted loudly and regularly. Our red "feminists" are M.I.A. about it, their eyes closed by tears of the white man.
Anything that helps draw the lines more clearly is a good thing. If our enemies hate her, if they see her as their enemy, then she belongs here. Her presence is a giant signal "WE ARE YOUR ENEMY. WE SHELTER AND PRAISE THE APOSTATE. WE ARE PROUD TO HAVE HER HERE. LOOK, HERE SHE CAN SAY WHAT SHE WANTS. ". Face it- Europe won't, can't resist effectively. We, the U. S., are the real foe of slavery, the place they can't leave alone. Our culture is killing theirs.
So again, welcome.
Ayaan Ali Hirsi- WELCOME!!!
The web is full of rumours that Ms. Hirsi is moving to the U. S.
Their loss, our gain, she stands as a refutation and thorn to the enemies of freedom.
I hope her first act is to do something she can't do in Holland- buy a pistol.
No, wait, she won't be able to do that in N. Y. or D. C., either. Oh well.
If she wants a sponsor, sign me up!
Their loss, our gain, she stands as a refutation and thorn to the enemies of freedom.
I hope her first act is to do something she can't do in Holland- buy a pistol.
No, wait, she won't be able to do that in N. Y. or D. C., either. Oh well.
If she wants a sponsor, sign me up!
Wednesday, May 10, 2006
Absolutely hilarious dance routine...
I know, it's all over the web, but Judson Laipply's "Evolution of Dance" is hilarious. I'm green with envy.
Love that YouTube.
"Click here to watch it."
Love that YouTube.
Monday, May 08, 2006
The unsaid thing about Moussaoui...
If, on September 5, 2001, Zacarias Moussaoui had called the F. B. I. and told what he knew, he'd now be 4 years into a life of freedom, with an annuity and a new identity.
And if one of the 19 had, he'd also be rich, renamed, and not just vapour.
Future conspirators should always remember that there is a really good escape hatch. We WILL make it worth your while to save your own life and the lives of innocents.
No one has said this as far as I know. and it should have been trumpeted loudly.
And if one of the 19 had, he'd also be rich, renamed, and not just vapour.
Future conspirators should always remember that there is a really good escape hatch. We WILL make it worth your while to save your own life and the lives of innocents.
No one has said this as far as I know. and it should have been trumpeted loudly.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)